↓ Skip to main content

A Perspective on Cortical Layering and Layer-Spanning Neuronal Elements

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 1,229)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
66 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
242 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Perspective on Cortical Layering and Layer-Spanning Neuronal Elements
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, July 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnana.2018.00056
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew E. Larkum, Lucy S. Petro, Robert N. S. Sachdev, Lars Muckli

Abstract

This review article addresses the function of the layers of the cerebral cortex. We develop the perspective that cortical layering needs to be understood in terms of its functional anatomy, i.e., the terminations of synaptic inputs on distinct cellular compartments and their effect on cortical activity. The cortex is a hierarchical structure in which feed forward and feedback pathways have a layer-specific termination pattern. We take the view that the influence of synaptic inputs arriving at different cortical layers can only be understood in terms of their complex interaction with cellular biophysics and the subsequent computation that occurs at the cellular level. We use high-resolution fMRI, which can resolve activity across layers, as a case study for implementing this approach by describing how cognitive events arising from the laminar distribution of inputs can be interpreted by taking into account the properties of neurons that span different layers. This perspective is based on recent advances in measuring subcellular activity in distinct feed-forward and feedback axons and in dendrites as they span across layers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 242 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 23%
Researcher 46 19%
Student > Master 33 14%
Student > Bachelor 26 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 4%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 48 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 78 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 13%
Psychology 13 5%
Computer Science 12 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 5%
Other 34 14%
Unknown 61 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2020.
All research outputs
#998,392
of 24,580,204 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#40
of 1,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,075
of 301,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#3
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,580,204 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.