You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Overlapping Distribution of Orexin and Endocannabinoid Receptors and Their Functional Interaction in the Brain of Adult Zebrafish
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnana.2018.00062 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roberta Imperatore, Livia D’Angelo, Omid Safari, Hamidreza Ahmadniaye Motlagh, Fabiana Piscitelli, Paolo de Girolamo, Luigia Cristino, Ettore Varricchio, Vincenzo di Marzo, Marina Paolucci |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 24% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 12 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2018.
All research outputs
#16,689,742
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#737
of 1,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,784
of 344,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#12
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,272 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.