↓ Skip to main content

Optimization of GFP Fluorescence Preservation by a Modified uDISCO Clearing Protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimization of GFP Fluorescence Preservation by a Modified uDISCO Clearing Protocol
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnana.2018.00067
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yusha Li, Jianyi Xu, Peng Wan, Tingting Yu, Dan Zhu

Abstract

Tissue optical clearing techniques provide alternative approaches for imaging large-volume specimens. uDISCO, an organic-solvent-based method, stands out from the enormous array of available optical clearing methods by achieving whole-brain imaging with high transparency, size reduction and fluorescence preservation. In this study, we aimed to modify the uDISCO protocol to achieve better fluorescence preservation and to thereby further improve its optical imaging quality. First, we determined the optimal pH value for optimized uDISCO, termed "a-uDISCO" (alkaline pH-based uDISCO). Then, we compared fluorescence preservation between a-uDISCO and uDISCO. In addition, we validated the clearing performance of the optimized method according to several parameters, including tissue transparency, size changes, and the maintenance of cell morphology. Finally, we demonstrated that a-uDISCO enabled the high-quality brain-wide visualization of neuronal structures. This method potentially provides a better alternative for high-throughput imaging of samples with low-level fluorescence protein expression or for archiving and repetitive revisiting of rare samples.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Master 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 28 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 21%
Neuroscience 12 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 10%
Engineering 2 3%
Materials Science 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 32 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2024.
All research outputs
#15,990,815
of 25,295,968 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#716
of 1,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,205
of 336,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#12
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,295,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,257 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.