You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fast Homogeneous En Bloc Staining of Large Tissue Samples for Volume Electron Microscopy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnana.2018.00076 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christel Genoud, Benjamin Titze, Alexandra Graff-Meyer, Rainer W. Friedrich |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 4 | 50% |
| Italy | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 14 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 14 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2018.
All research outputs
#6,518,909
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#408
of 1,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,376
of 341,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#7
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,169 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.