You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Adeno-Associated Virus Technologies and Methods for Targeted Neuronal Manipulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnana.2019.00093 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leila Haery, Benjamin E. Deverman, Katherine S. Matho, Ali Cetin, Kenton Woodard, Connie Cepko, Karen I. Guerin, Meghan A. Rego, Ina Ersing, Susanna M. Bachle, Joanne Kamens, Melina Fan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 16% |
| United States | 3 | 16% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| Chile | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 74% |
| Scientists | 5 | 26% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 547 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 547 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 110 | 20% |
| Researcher | 93 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 47 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 44 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 5% |
| Other | 62 | 11% |
| Unknown | 164 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 175 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 70 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 55 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 3% |
| Engineering | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 43 | 8% |
| Unknown | 176 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,516,405
of 25,508,813 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#64
of 1,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,990
of 477,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,508,813 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 477,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.