↓ Skip to main content

Th17 and Cognitive Impairment: Possible Mechanisms of Action

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
17 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Th17 and Cognitive Impairment: Possible Mechanisms of Action
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, November 2019
DOI 10.3389/fnana.2019.00095
Pubmed ID
Authors

Virginia Cipollini, Josef Anrather, Francesco Orzi, Costantino Iadecola

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 108 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 18%
Unspecified 12 11%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Researcher 10 9%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 27 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 14 13%
Unspecified 12 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 8%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 37 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,210,438
of 25,622,179 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#105
of 1,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,765
of 476,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,622,179 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.