↓ Skip to main content

In Vivo Neural Interfaces—From Small- to Large-Scale Recording

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nanotechnology, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In Vivo Neural Interfaces—From Small- to Large-Scale Recording
Published in
Frontiers in Nanotechnology, June 2022
DOI 10.3389/fnano.2022.885411
Authors

Bingjie Zhang, Chunshan Deng, Chunzhi Cai, Xiaojian Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Unknown 6 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 5 45%
Engineering 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2022.
All research outputs
#18,375,478
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nanotechnology
#141
of 229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#306,245
of 437,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nanotechnology
#19
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 229 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.