↓ Skip to main content

Innate Recognition of Pheromone and Food Odors in Moths: A Common Mechanism in the Antennal Lobe?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Innate Recognition of Pheromone and Food Odors in Moths: A Common Mechanism in the Antennal Lobe?
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2010
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2010.00159
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joshua P. Martin, John G. Hildebrand

Abstract

The survival of an animal often depends on an innate response to a particular sensory stimulus. For an adult male moth, two categories of odors are innately attractive: pheromone released by conspecific females, and the floral scents of certain, often co-evolved, plants. These odors consist of multiple volatiles in characteristic mixtures. Here, we review evidence that both categories of odors are processed as sensory objects, and we suggest a mechanism in the primary olfactory center, the antennal lobe (AL), that encodes the configuration of these mixtures and may underlie recognition of innately attractive odors. In the pheromone system, mixtures of two or three volatiles elicit upwind flight. Peripheral changes are associated with behavioral changes in speciation, and suggest the existence of a pattern recognition mechanism for pheromone mixtures in the AL. Moths are similarly innately attracted to certain floral scents. Though floral scents consist of multiple volatiles that activate a broad array of receptor neurons, only a smaller subset, numerically comparable to pheromone mixtures, is necessary and sufficient to elicit behavior. Both pheromone and floral scent mixtures that produce attraction to the odor source elicit synchronous action potentials in particular populations of output (projection) neurons (PNs) in the AL. We propose a model in which the synchronous output of a population of PNs encodes the configuration of an innately attractive mixture, and thus comprises an innate mechanism for releasing odor-tracking behavior. The particular example of olfaction in moths may inform the general question of how sensory objects trigger innate responses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 5%
United States 2 3%
Netherlands 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 55 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 29%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Professor 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 66%
Neuroscience 7 11%
Psychology 3 5%
Engineering 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 7 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2012.
All research outputs
#18,313,878
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#2,585
of 3,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,982
of 163,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#22
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.