↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Endocannabinoid System Modulation on Cognitive and Emotional Behavior

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
174 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
265 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of Endocannabinoid System Modulation on Cognitive and Emotional Behavior
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2011.00057
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudio Zanettini, Leigh V. Panlilio, Mano Aliczki, Steven R. Goldberg, József Haller, Sevil Yasar

Abstract

Cannabis has long been known to produce cognitive and emotional effects. Research has shown that cannabinoid drugs produce these effects by driving the brain's endogenous cannabinoid system and that this system plays a modulatory role in many cognitive and emotional processes. This review focuses on the effects of endocannabinoid system modulation in animal models of cognition (learning and memory) and emotion (anxiety and depression). We review studies in which natural or synthetic cannabinoid agonists were administered to directly stimulate cannabinoid receptors or, conversely, where cannabinoid antagonists were administered to inhibit the activity of cannabinoid receptors. In addition, studies are reviewed that involved genetic disruption of cannabinoid receptors or genetic or pharmacological manipulation of the endocannabinoid-degrading enzyme, fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH). Endocannabinoids affect the function of many neurotransmitter systems, some of which play opposing roles. The diversity of cannabinoid roles and the complexity of task-dependent activation of neuronal circuits may lead to the effects of endocannabinoid system modulation being strongly dependent on environmental conditions. Recent findings are reviewed that raise the possibility that endocannabinoid signaling may change the impact of environmental influences on emotional and cognitive behavior rather than selectively affecting any specific behavior.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Lebanon 1 <1%
Unknown 253 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 47 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 16%
Researcher 37 14%
Student > Master 37 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 37 14%
Unknown 47 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 51 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 17%
Psychology 41 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 6%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 58 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2013.
All research outputs
#20,194,150
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#2,812
of 3,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,941
of 180,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#43
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,147 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.