↓ Skip to main content

Representation of Non-Spatial and Spatial Information in the Lateral Entorhinal Cortex

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
448 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Representation of Non-Spatial and Spatial Information in the Lateral Entorhinal Cortex
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2011.00069
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sachin S. Deshmukh, James J. Knierim

Abstract

Some theories of memory propose that the hippocampus integrates the individual items and events of experience within a contextual or spatial framework. The hippocampus receives cortical input from two major pathways: the medial entorhinal cortex (MEC) and the lateral entorhinal cortex (LEC). During exploration in an open field, the firing fields of MEC grid cells form a periodically repeating, triangular array. In contrast, LEC neurons show little spatial selectivity, and it has been proposed that the LEC may provide non-spatial input to the hippocampus. Here, we recorded MEC and LEC neurons while rats explored an open field that contained discrete objects. LEC cells fired selectively at locations relative to the objects, whereas MEC cells were weakly influenced by the objects. These results provide the first direct demonstration of a double dissociation between LEC and MEC inputs to the hippocampus under conditions of exploration typically used to study hippocampal place cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 448 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
United Kingdom 5 1%
France 3 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 420 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 138 31%
Researcher 70 16%
Student > Master 57 13%
Student > Bachelor 43 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 6%
Other 61 14%
Unknown 53 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 145 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 125 28%
Psychology 33 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 6%
Engineering 13 3%
Other 40 9%
Unknown 66 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2018.
All research outputs
#19,365,883
of 24,661,251 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#2,576
of 3,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,833
of 190,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#36
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,661,251 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.