↓ Skip to main content

Striatal intrinsic reinforcement signals during recognition memory: relationship to response bias and dysregulation in schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Striatal intrinsic reinforcement signals during recognition memory: relationship to response bias and dysregulation in schizophrenia
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2011.00081
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel H. Wolf, RaphaelT. Gerraty, Theodore D. Satterthwaite, James Loughead, Timothy Campellone, Mark A. Elliott, Bruce I. Turetsky, Ruben C. Gur, Raquel E. Gur

Abstract

Ventral striatum (VS) is a critical brain region for reinforcement learning and motivation, and VS hypofunction is implicated in psychiatric disorders including schizophrenia. Providing rewards or performance feedback has been shown to activate VS. Intrinsically motivated subjects performing challenging cognitive tasks are likely to engage reinforcement circuitry even in the absence of external feedback or incentives. However, such intrinsic reinforcement responses have received little attention, have not been examined in relation to behavioral performance, and have not been evaluated for impairment in neuropsychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia. Here we used fMRI to examine a challenging "old" vs. "new" visual recognition task in healthy subjects and patients with schizophrenia. Targets were unique fractal stimuli previously presented as salient distractors in a visual oddball task, producing incidental memory encoding. Based on the prediction error theory of reinforcement learning, we hypothesized that correct target recognition would activate VS in controls, and that this activation would be greater in subjects with lower expectation of responding correctly as indexed by a more conservative response bias. We also predicted these effects would be reduced in patients with schizophrenia. Consistent with these predictions, controls activated VS and other reinforcement processing regions during correct recognition, with greater VS activation in those with a more conservative response bias. Patients did not show either effect, with significant group differences suggesting hyporesponsivity in patients to internally generated feedback. These findings highlight the importance of accounting for intrinsic motivation and reward when studying cognitive tasks, and add to growing evidence of reward circuit dysfunction in schizophrenia that may impact cognition and function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 104 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 23%
Researcher 20 19%
Student > Master 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Professor 5 5%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 13 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 48 45%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 11%
Neuroscience 12 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 20 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2011.
All research outputs
#20,165,369
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#2,811
of 3,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,848
of 180,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#43
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.