↓ Skip to main content

Binocular Interactions Underlying the Classic Optomotor Responses of Flying Flies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Binocular Interactions Underlying the Classic Optomotor Responses of Flying Flies
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian J. Duistermars, Rachel A. Care, Mark A. Frye

Abstract

In response to imposed course deviations, the optomotor reactions of animals reduce motion blur and facilitate the maintenance of stable body posture. In flies, many anatomical and electrophysiological studies suggest that disparate motion cues stimulating the left and right eyes are not processed in isolation but rather are integrated in the brain to produce a cohesive panoramic percept. To investigate the strength of such inter-ocular interactions and their role in compensatory sensory-motor transformations, we utilize a virtual reality flight simulator to record wing and head optomotor reactions by tethered flying flies in response to imposed binocular rotation and monocular front-to-back and back-to-front motion. Within a narrow range of stimulus parameters that generates large contrast insensitive optomotor responses to binocular rotation, we find that responses to monocular front-to-back motion are larger than those to panoramic rotation, but are contrast sensitive. Conversely, responses to monocular back-to-front motion are slower than those to rotation and peak at the lowest tested contrast. Together our results suggest that optomotor responses to binocular rotation result from the influence of non-additive contralateral inhibitory as well as excitatory circuit interactions that serve to confer contrast insensitivity to flight behaviors influenced by rotatory optic flow.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Austria 2 2%
Germany 2 2%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 75 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 37%
Researcher 20 24%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 43%
Neuroscience 18 22%
Engineering 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 9 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2012.
All research outputs
#17,570,449
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#2,421
of 3,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,360
of 251,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#47
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.