↓ Skip to main content

The endocannabinoid system: an overview

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
16 X users
facebook
19 Facebook pages
googleplus
6 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
432 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The endocannabinoid system: an overview
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalia Battista, Monia Di Tommaso, Monica Bari, Mauro Maccarrone

Abstract

Upon the identification of anandamide (AEA) in the porcine brain, numerous studies contributed to the current state of knowledge regarding all elements that form the "endocannabinoid system (ECS)."How this complex system of receptors, ligands, and enzymes is integrated in helping to regulate fundamental processes at level of central nervous and peripheral systems and how its regulation and dysregulation might counteract disturbances of such functions, is nowadays still under investigation. However, the most recent advances on the physiological distribution and functional role of ECS allowed the progress of various research tools aimed at the therapeutic exploitation of endocannabinoid (eCB) signaling, as well as the development of novel drugs with pharmacological advantages. Here, we shall briefly overview the metabolic and signal transduction pathways of the main eCBs representatives, AEA, and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), and we will discuss the therapeutic potential of new ECS-oriented drugs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 432 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 424 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 83 19%
Student > Master 66 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 11%
Researcher 44 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 6%
Other 48 11%
Unknown 117 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 9%
Neuroscience 36 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 32 7%
Other 78 18%
Unknown 125 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 142. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2022.
All research outputs
#277,955
of 24,635,922 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#53
of 3,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,421
of 253,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#2
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,635,922 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.