↓ Skip to main content

Texture-induced vibrations in the forearm during tactile exploration

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Texture-induced vibrations in the forearm during tactile exploration
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00037
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benoit Delhaye, Vincent Hayward, Philippe Lefèvre, Jean-Louis Thonnard

Abstract

Humans can detect and discriminate between fine variations of surface roughness using active touch. It is hitherto believed that roughness perception is mediated mostly by cutaneous and subcutaneous afferents located in the fingertips. However, recent findings have shown that following abolishment of cutaneous afferences resulting from trauma or pharmacological intervention, the ability of subjects to discriminate between textures roughness was not significantly altered. These findings suggest that the somatosensory system is able to collect textural information from other sources than fingertip afference. It follows that signals resulting of the interaction of a finger with a rough surface must be transmitted to stimulate receptor populations in regions far away from the contact. This transmission was characterized by measuring in the wrist vibrations originating at the fingertip and thus propagating through the finger, the hand and the wrist during active exploration of textured surfaces. The spectral analysis of the vibrations taking place in the forearm tissues revealed regularities that were correlated with the scanned surface and the speed of exploration. In the case of periodic textures, the vibration signal contained a fundamental frequency component corresponding to the finger velocity divided by the spatial period of the stimulus. This regularity was found for a wide range of textural length scales and scanning velocities. For non-periodic textures, the spectrum of the vibration did not contain obvious features that would enable discrimination between the different stimuli. However, for both periodic and non-periodic stimuli, the intensity of the vibrations could be related to the microgeometry of the scanned surfaces.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 129 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 32%
Researcher 23 17%
Student > Master 19 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 16 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 43 31%
Neuroscience 17 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 7%
Computer Science 8 6%
Other 26 19%
Unknown 22 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2012.
All research outputs
#15,249,959
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#2,211
of 3,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,175
of 244,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#47
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.