Title |
Are fear memories erasable?–reconsolidation of learned fear with fear-relevant and fear-irrelevant stimuli
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2012
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00080 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Armita Golkar, Martin Bellander, Andreas Olsson, Arne Öhman |
Abstract |
Recent advances in the field of fear learning have demonstrated that a single reminder exposure prior to extinction training can prevent the return of extinguished fear by disrupting the process of reconsolidation. These findings have however proven hard to replicate in humans. Given the significant implications of preventing the return of fear, the purpose of the present study was to further study the putative effects of disrupting reconsolidation. In two experiments, we assessed whether extinction training initiated within the reconsolidation time window could abolish the return of fear using fear-relevant (Experiment 1) or fear-irrelevant (Experiment 2) conditioned stimuli (CS). In both experiments, participants went through conditioning, extinction, and reinstatement testing on three consecutive days, with one of two reinforced CS being reactivated 10 min prior to extinction. We found that a single reminder exposure prior to extinction training did not prevent the return of extinguished fear responding using either fear-relevant or fear-irrelevant CSs. Our findings point to the need to further study the specific parameters that enable disruption of reconsolidation. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 25% |
Belgium | 1 | 13% |
Romania | 1 | 13% |
Denmark | 1 | 13% |
Italy | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
Scientists | 3 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 3 | 2% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 145 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 26% |
Researcher | 24 | 16% |
Student > Master | 24 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 5% |
Other | 26 | 17% |
Unknown | 16 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 83 | 54% |
Neuroscience | 24 | 16% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 3% |
Unknown | 24 | 16% |