↓ Skip to main content

Are fear memories erasable?–reconsolidation of learned fear with fear-relevant and fear-irrelevant stimuli

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Are fear memories erasable?–reconsolidation of learned fear with fear-relevant and fear-irrelevant stimuli
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00080
Pubmed ID
Authors

Armita Golkar, Martin Bellander, Andreas Olsson, Arne Öhman

Abstract

Recent advances in the field of fear learning have demonstrated that a single reminder exposure prior to extinction training can prevent the return of extinguished fear by disrupting the process of reconsolidation. These findings have however proven hard to replicate in humans. Given the significant implications of preventing the return of fear, the purpose of the present study was to further study the putative effects of disrupting reconsolidation. In two experiments, we assessed whether extinction training initiated within the reconsolidation time window could abolish the return of fear using fear-relevant (Experiment 1) or fear-irrelevant (Experiment 2) conditioned stimuli (CS). In both experiments, participants went through conditioning, extinction, and reinstatement testing on three consecutive days, with one of two reinforced CS being reactivated 10 min prior to extinction. We found that a single reminder exposure prior to extinction training did not prevent the return of extinguished fear responding using either fear-relevant or fear-irrelevant CSs. Our findings point to the need to further study the specific parameters that enable disruption of reconsolidation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 2%
France 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 145 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 26%
Researcher 24 16%
Student > Master 24 16%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 5%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 16 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 83 54%
Neuroscience 24 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 5%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 24 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,286,720
of 25,182,110 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#205
of 3,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,264
of 256,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#4
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,182,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.