↓ Skip to main content

Hippocampus-dependent place learning enables spatial flexibility in C57BL6/N mice

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hippocampus-dependent place learning enables spatial flexibility in C57BL6/N mice
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00087
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karl R. Kleinknecht, Benedikt T. Bedenk, Sebastian F. Kaltwasser, Barbara Grünecker, Yi-Chun Yen, Michael Czisch, Carsten T. Wotjak

Abstract

Spatial navigation is a fundamental capability necessary in everyday life to locate food, social partners, and shelter. It results from two very different strategies: (1) place learning which enables for flexible way finding and (2) response learning that leads to a more rigid "route following." Despite the importance of knockout techniques that are only available in mice, little is known about mice' flexibility in spatial navigation tasks. Here we demonstrate for C57BL6/N mice in a water-cross maze (WCM) that only place learning enables spatial flexibility and relearning of a platform position, whereas response learning does not. This capability depends on an intact hippocampal formation, since hippocampus lesions by ibotenic acid (IA) disrupted relearning. In vivo manganese-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging revealed a volume loss of ≥60% of the hippocampus as a critical threshold for relearning impairments. In particular the changes in the left ventral hippocampus were indicative of relearning deficits. In summary, our findings establish the importance of hippocampus-dependent place learning for spatial flexibility and provide a first systematic analysis on spatial flexibility in mice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 83 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 23%
Student > Master 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 10 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 28%
Neuroscience 24 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Psychology 4 5%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 16 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2012.
All research outputs
#20,178,031
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#2,811
of 3,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,229
of 244,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#59
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.