You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neuroimaging resilience to stress: a review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00039 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. J. A. van der Werff, S. M. van den Berg, J. N. Pannekoek, B. M. Elzinga, N. J. A. van der Wee |
| Abstract |
There is a high degree of intra-individual variation in how individuals respond to stress. This becomes evident when exploring the development of posttraumatic symptoms or stress-related disorders after exposure to trauma. Whether or not an individual develops posttraumatic symptoms after experiencing a traumatic event is partly dependent on a person's resilience. Resilience can be broadly defined as the dynamic process encompassing positive adaptation within the context of significant adversity. Even though research into the neurobiological basis of resilience is still in its early stages, these insights can have important implications for the prevention and treatment of stress-related disorders. Neuroimaging studies contribute to our knowledge of intra-individual variability in resilience and the development of posttraumatic symptoms or other stress-related disorders. This review provides an overview of neuroimaging findings related to resilience. Structural, resting-state, and task-related neuroimaging results associated with resilience are discussed. There are a limited number of studies available and neuroimaging research of resilience is still in its infancy. The available studies point at brain circuitries involved in stress and emotion regulation, with more efficient processing and regulation associated with resilience. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | 18% |
| Germany | 2 | 18% |
| United States | 2 | 18% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 91% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 424 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 412 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 87 | 21% |
| Researcher | 68 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 55 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 38 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 7% |
| Other | 71 | 17% |
| Unknown | 74 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 123 | 29% |
| Neuroscience | 74 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 40 | 9% |
| Unknown | 91 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,107,308
of 24,933,778 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#340
of 3,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,159
of 292,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#18
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,933,778 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.