↓ Skip to main content

Spatial learning of female mice: a role of the mineralocorticoid receptor during stress and the estrous cycle

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spatial learning of female mice: a role of the mineralocorticoid receptor during stress and the estrous cycle
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00056
Pubmed ID
Authors

Judith P. ter Horst, Jiska Kentrop, Marit Arp, Chantal J. Hubens, E. Ron de Kloet, Melly S. Oitzl

Abstract

Corticosterone facilitates behavioral adaptation to a novel experience in a coordinate manner via mineralocorticoid (MR) and glucocorticoid receptors (GR). Initially, MR mediates corticosterone action on appraisal processes, risk assessment and behavioral flexibility and then, GR activation promotes consolidation of the new information into memory. Here, we studied on the circular holeboard (CHB) the spatial performance of female mice with genetic deletion of MR from the forebrain (MR(CaMKCre)) and their wild type littermates (MR(flox/flox) mice) over the estrous cycle and in response to an acute stressor. The estrous cycle had no effect on the spatial performance of MR(flox/flox) mice and neither did the acute stressor. However, the MR(CaMKCre) mutants needed significantly more time to find the exit and made more hole visit errors than the MR(flox/flox) mice, especially when in proestrus and estrus. In addition, stressed MR(CaMKCre) mice in estrus had a shorter exit latency than the control estrus MR(CaMKCre) mice. About 70% of the female MR(CaMKCre) and MR(flox/flox) mice used a hippocampal (spatial, extra maze cues) rather than the caudate nucleus (stimulate-response, S-R, intra-maze cue) strategy and this preference did neither change over the estrous cycle nor after stress. However, stressed MR(CaMKCre) mice using the S-R strategy needed significantly more time to find the exit hole as compared to the spatial strategy using mice suggesting that the MR could be needed for the stress-induced strategy switch toward a spatial strategy. In conclusion, the results suggest that loss of MR interferes with performance of a spatial task especially when estrogen levels are high suggesting a strong interaction between stress and sex hormones.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 4%
Norway 1 2%
Unknown 49 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 27%
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 15 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 25%
Psychology 7 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 6 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2013.
All research outputs
#1,241,494
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#198
of 3,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,738
of 280,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#13
of 165 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,147 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 165 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.