↓ Skip to main content

Pupil dilation signals uncertainty and surprise in a learning gambling task

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
243 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pupil dilation signals uncertainty and surprise in a learning gambling task
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00218
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudio Lavín, René San Martín, Eduardo Rosales Jubal

Abstract

Pupil dilation under constant illumination is a physiological marker where modulation is related to several cognitive functions involved in daily decision making. There is evidence for a role of pupil dilation change during decision-making tasks associated with uncertainty, reward-prediction errors and surprise. However, while some work suggests that pupil dilation is mainly modulated by reward predictions, others point out that this marker is related to uncertainty signaling and surprise. Supporting the latter hypothesis, the neural substrate of this marker is related to noradrenaline (NA) activity which has been also related to uncertainty signaling. In this work we aimed to test whether pupil dilation is a marker for uncertainty and surprise in a learning task. We recorded pupil dilation responses in 10 participants performing the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), a decision-making task that requires learning and constant monitoring of outcomes' feedback, which are important variables within the traditional study of human decision making. Results showed that pupil dilation changes were modulated by learned uncertainty and surprise regardless of feedback magnitudes. Interestingly, greater pupil dilation changes were found during positive feedback (PF) presentation when there was lower uncertainty about a future negative feedback (NF); and by surprise during NF presentation. These results support the hypothesis that pupil dilation is a marker of learned uncertainty, and may be used as a marker of NA activity facing unfamiliar situations in humans.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 235 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 26%
Student > Master 38 16%
Researcher 33 14%
Student > Bachelor 31 13%
Student > Postgraduate 13 5%
Other 31 13%
Unknown 35 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 94 39%
Neuroscience 38 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 3%
Computer Science 5 2%
Other 27 11%
Unknown 55 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2017.
All research outputs
#1,423,355
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#239
of 3,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,321
of 305,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#6
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.