↓ Skip to main content

Identification and optogenetic manipulation of memory engrams in the hippocampus

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
459 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification and optogenetic manipulation of memory engrams in the hippocampus
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00226
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steve Ramirez, Susumu Tonegawa, Xu Liu

Abstract

With the accumulation of our knowledge about how memories are formed, consolidated, retrieved, and updated, neuroscience is now reaching a point where discrete memories can be identified and manipulated at rapid timescales. Here, we start with historical studies that lead to the modern memory engram theory. Then, we will review recent advances in memory engram research that combine transgenic and optogenetic approaches to reveal the underlying neuronal substrates sufficient for activating mnemonic processes. We will focus on three concepts: (1) isolating memory engrams at the level of single cells to tag them for subsequent manipulation; (2) testing the sufficiency of these engrams for memory recall by artificially activating them; and (3) presenting new stimuli during the artificial activation of these engrams to induce an association between the two to form a false memory. We propose that hippocampal cells that show activity-dependent changes during learning construct a cellular basis for contextual memory engrams.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 459 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
Germany 3 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 435 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 101 22%
Student > Bachelor 74 16%
Researcher 71 15%
Student > Master 50 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 5%
Other 79 17%
Unknown 59 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 150 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 119 26%
Psychology 40 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 4%
Other 36 8%
Unknown 69 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,375,453
of 25,402,528 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#395
of 3,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,426
of 319,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#10
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,528 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.