↓ Skip to main content

Timing matters: using optogenetics to chronically manipulate neural circuitry and rhythms

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Timing matters: using optogenetics to chronically manipulate neural circuitry and rhythms
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00041
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle M. Sidor, Colleen A. McClung

Abstract

The ability to probe defined neural circuits with both the spatial and temporal resolution imparted by optogenetics has transformed the field of neuroscience. Although much attention has been paid to the advantages of manipulating neural activity at millisecond timescales in order to elicit time-locked neural responses, little consideration has been given to the manipulation of circuit activity at physiologically relevant times of day, across multiple days. Nearly all biological events are governed by the circadian clock and exhibit 24 h rhythms in activity. Indeed, neural circuit activity itself exhibits a daily rhythm with distinct temporal peaks in activity occurring at specific times of the day. Therefore, experimentally probing circuit function within and across physiologically relevant time windows (minutes to hours) in behaving animals is fundamental to understanding the function of any one particular circuit within the intact brain. Furthermore, understanding how circuit function changes with repeated manipulation is important for modeling the circuit-wide disruptions that occur with chronic disease states. Here, we review recent advances in optogenetic technology that allow for chronic, temporally specific, control of circuit activity and provide examples of chronic optogenetic paradigms that have been utilized in the search for the neural circuit basis of behaviors relevant to human neuropsychiatric disease.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
United States 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 130 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 25%
Researcher 26 19%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Master 12 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 8%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 20 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 32%
Neuroscience 37 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 7%
Engineering 10 7%
Psychology 5 4%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 23 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2015.
All research outputs
#22,983,009
of 25,626,416 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#3,114
of 3,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,888
of 320,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#57
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,626,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,483 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.