↓ Skip to main content

Inhibition of PKC disrupts addiction-related memory

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inhibition of PKC disrupts addiction-related memory
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, March 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00070
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristin K. Howell, Bradley R. Monk, Stephanie A. Carmack, Oliver D. Mrowczynski, Robert E. Clark, Stephan G. Anagnostaras

Abstract

The atypical PKC isoforms, PKMζ and PKCλ have been proposed as integral substrates of long-term memory (LTM). Inhibition of these isoforms has recently been demonstrated to be sufficient for impairing the expression and maintenance of long-term potentiation. Additionally, the pseudosubstrate inhibitor, zeta inhibitory peptide (ZIP), which effectively blocks PKMζ and PKCλ, has previously been shown to disrupt associative memory; very little is known about its effects on pathological nonassociative forms of memory related to addiction. The neural and molecular substrates of memory and addiction have recently been argued to overlap. Here, we used ZIP to disrupt PKMζ and PKCλ activity to examine their role in cocaine sensitization, a nonassociative, addiction-related memory argued to underlie the transition from casual to pathological drug use. We examined the effects of both continuous and acute administration of ZIP. Even a single application of ZIP blocked the development of sensitization; sustained inhibition using osmotic pumps produced an almost complete blockade of sensitization. Further, a single application of ZIP was shown to reduce membrane-bound AMPAR expression. These results demonstrate a novel, critical role for the atypical PKC isoforms in nonassociative memory and cocaine addiction.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 8%
Unknown 23 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 6 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 24%
Neuroscience 4 16%
Psychology 3 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 6 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2015.
All research outputs
#18,366,246
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#2,591
of 3,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,790
of 221,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#43
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.