↓ Skip to main content

The Sweet Drive Test: refining phenotypic characterization of anhedonic behavior in rodents

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Sweet Drive Test: refining phenotypic characterization of anhedonic behavior in rodents
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, March 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00074
Pubmed ID
Authors

António Mateus-Pinheiro, Patrícia Patrício, Nuno D. Alves, Ana R. Machado-Santos, Monica Morais, João M. Bessa, Nuno Sousa, Luisa Pinto

Abstract

Measuring anhedonic behavior in rodents is a challenging task as current methods display only moderate sensitivity to detect anhedonic phenotype and, consequently, results from different labs are frequently incongruent. Herein we present a newly-developed test, the Sweet Drive Test (SDT), which integrates food preference measurement in a non-aversive environment, with ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) recording. Animals were placed in a soundproofed black arena, under red light illumination, and allowed to choose between regular and sweet food pellets. During the test trials, 50 KHz USVs, previously described to be associated with positive experiences, were recorded. In a first experimental approach, we demonstrate the ability of SDT to accurately characterize anhedonic behavior in animals chronically exposed to stress. In a subsequent set of experiments, we show that this paradigm has high sensitivity to detect mood-improving effects of antidepressants. The combined analysis of both food preference and the number of 50 KHz vocalizations in the SDT provides also a valuable tool to discriminate animals that responded to treatment from non-responder animals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 3 3%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 102 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 17%
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Master 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 21 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 23%
Neuroscience 24 23%
Psychology 11 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 28 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2014.
All research outputs
#17,716,357
of 22,749,166 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#2,401
of 3,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,626
of 221,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#41
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,749,166 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.