You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neural Correlates of Spatial Navigation Changes in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer’s Disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00089 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kamil Vlček, Jan Laczó |
| Abstract |
Although the memory impairment is a hallmark of Alzheimer's disease (AD), AD has also been characterized by spatial disorientation, which is present from its early stages. Spatial disorientation in AD manifests itself in getting lost in familiar and unfamiliar places and have been characterized more specifically using spatial navigation tests in both real space and virtual environments as an impairment in multiple spatial abilities, including allocentric and egocentric navigation strategies, visuo-spatial perception, or selection of relevant information for successful navigation. Patients suffering mild cognitive impairment (MCI), who are at a high risk of development of dementia, show impairment in a subset of these abilities, mainly connected with allocentric and egocentric processing. While spatial disorientation in typical AD patients probably reflects neurodegenerative changes in medial and posterior temporal, parietal, and frontal lobes, and retrosplenial cortex, the impairment of spatial navigation in MCI seem to be connected mainly with the medial temporal and also parietal brain changes. In this review, we will summarize the signs of brain disease in most MCI and AD patients showing in various tasks of spatial memory and navigation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 190 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 15% |
| Researcher | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 41 | 21% |
| Unknown | 32 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 55 | 28% |
| Neuroscience | 46 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 13% |
| Unknown | 38 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2016.
All research outputs
#3,111,872
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#554
of 3,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,529
of 243,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#10
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.