↓ Skip to main content

Episodic Memories in Anxiety Disorders: Clinical Implications

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Episodic Memories in Anxiety Disorders: Clinical Implications
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, April 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00131
Pubmed ID
Authors

Armin Zlomuzica, Dorothea Dere, Alla Machulska, Dirk Adolph, Ekrem Dere, Jürgen Margraf

Abstract

The aim of this review is to summarize research on the emerging role of episodic memories in the context of anxiety disorders (AD). The available literature on explicit, autobiographical, and episodic memory function in AD including neuroimaging studies is critically discussed. We describe the methodological diversity of episodic memory research in AD and discuss the need for novel tests to measure episodic memory in a clinical setting. We argue that alterations in episodic memory functions might contribute to the etiology of AD. We further explain why future research on the interplay between episodic memory function and emotional disorders as well as its neuroanatomical foundations offers the promise to increase the effectiveness of modern psychological treatments. We conclude that one major task is to develop methods and training programs that might help patients suffering from AD to better understand, interpret, and possibly actively use their episodic memories in a way that would support therapeutic interventions and counteract the occurrence of symptoms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
France 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 171 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 16%
Student > Bachelor 23 13%
Researcher 21 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 40 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 86 48%
Neuroscience 18 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 3%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 51 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,598,153
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#618
of 3,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,082
of 227,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#20
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.