↓ Skip to main content

Infant rats can learn time intervals before the maturation of the striatum: evidence from odor fear conditioning

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Infant rats can learn time intervals before the maturation of the striatum: evidence from odor fear conditioning
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, May 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00176
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie Boulanger Bertolus, Chloe Hegoburu, Jessica L. Ahers, Elizabeth Londen, Juliette Rousselot, Karina Szyba, Marc Thévenet, Tristan A. Sullivan-Wilson, Valérie Doyère, Regina M. Sullivan, Anne-Marie Mouly

Abstract

Interval timing refers to the ability to perceive, estimate and discriminate durations in the range of seconds to minutes. Very little is currently known about the ontogeny of interval timing throughout development. On the other hand, even though the neural circuit sustaining interval timing is a matter of debate, the striatum has been suggested to be an important component of the system and its maturation occurs around the third post-natal (PN) week in rats. The global aim of the present study was to investigate interval timing abilities at an age for which striatum is not yet mature. We used odor fear conditioning, as it can be applied to very young animals. In odor fear conditioning, an odor is presented to the animal and a mild footshock is delivered after a fixed interval. Adult rats have been shown to learn the temporal relationships between the odor and the shock after a few associations. The first aim of the present study was to assess the activity of the striatum during odor fear conditioning using 2-Deoxyglucose autoradiography during development in rats. The data showed that although fear learning was displayed at all tested ages, activation of the striatum was observed in adults but not in juvenile animals. Next, we assessed the presence of evidence of interval timing in ages before and after the inclusion of the striatum into the fear conditioning circuit. We used an experimental setup allowing the simultaneous recording of freezing and respiration that have been demonstrated to be sensitive to interval timing in adult rats. This enabled the detection of duration-related temporal patterns for freezing and/or respiration curves in infants as young as 12 days PN during odor fear conditioning. This suggests that infants are able to encode time durations as well as and as quickly as adults while their striatum is not yet functional. Alternative networks possibly sustaining interval timing in infant rats are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Portugal 1 3%
France 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 28 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Student > Master 6 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Other 3 9%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 25%
Neuroscience 5 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 2 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2014.
All research outputs
#18,372,841
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#2,591
of 3,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,868
of 226,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#68
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.