↓ Skip to main content

Spatial representations of place cells in darkness are supported by path integration and border information

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spatial representations of place cells in darkness are supported by path integration and border information
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, June 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00222
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sijie Zhang, Fabian Schönfeld, Laurenz Wiskott, Denise Manahan-Vaughan

Abstract

Effective spatial navigation is enabled by reliable reference cues that derive from sensory information from the external environment, as well as from internal sources such as the vestibular system. The integration of information from these sources enables dead reckoning in the form of path integration. Navigation in the dark is associated with the accumulation of errors in terms of perception of allocentric position and this may relate to error accumulation in path integration. We assessed this by recording from place cells in the dark under circumstances where spatial sensory cues were suppressed. Spatial information content, spatial coherence, place field size, and peak and infield firing rates decreased whereas sparsity increased following exploration in the dark compared to the light. Nonetheless it was observed that place field stability in darkness was sustained by border information in a subset of place cells. To examine the impact of encountering the environment's border on navigation, we analyzed the trajectory and spiking data gathered during navigation in the dark. Our data suggest that although error accumulation in path integration drives place field drift in darkness, under circumstances where border contact is possible, this information is integrated to enable retention of spatial representations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
France 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 132 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 27%
Researcher 28 20%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Master 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 24 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 49 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 26%
Psychology 10 7%
Computer Science 5 4%
Engineering 5 4%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 24 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#4,357,415
of 25,390,203 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#722
of 3,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,221
of 239,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#13
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,390,203 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.