↓ Skip to main content

Olfactory preference conditioning changes the reward value of reinforced and non-reinforced odors

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Olfactory preference conditioning changes the reward value of reinforced and non-reinforced odors
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, July 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00229
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolas Torquet, Pascaline Aimé, Belkacem Messaoudi, Samuel Garcia, Elodie Ey, Rémi Gervais, A. Karyn Julliard, Nadine Ravel

Abstract

Olfaction is determinant for the organization of rodent behavior. In a feeding context, rodents must quickly discriminate whether a nutrient can be ingested or whether it represents a potential danger to them. To understand the learning processes that support food choice, aversive olfactory learning and flavor appetitive learning have been extensively studied. In contrast, little is currently known about olfactory appetitive learning and its mechanisms. We designed a new paradigm to study conditioned olfactory preference in rats. After 8 days of exposure to a pair of odors (one paired with sucrose and the other with water), rats developed a strong and stable preference for the odor associated with the sucrose solution. A series of experiments were conducted to further analyze changes in reward value induced by this paradigm for both stimuli. As expected, the reward value of the reinforced odor changed positively. Interestingly, the reward value of the alternative odor decreased. This devaluation had an impact on further odor comparisons that the animal had to make. This result suggests that appetitive conditioning involving a comparison between two odors not only leads to a change in the reward value of the reinforced odor, but also induces a stable devaluation of the non-reinforced stimulus.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 58 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Professor 4 7%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 16 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 17%
Psychology 6 10%
Engineering 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 19 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2014.
All research outputs
#14,770,832
of 25,155,561 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#1,642
of 3,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,705
of 233,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#35
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,155,561 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.