↓ Skip to main content

Pupil size variations correlate with physical effort perception

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pupil size variations correlate with physical effort perception
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, August 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00286
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandre Zénon, Mariam Sidibé, Etienne Olivier

Abstract

It has long been established that the pupil diameter increases during mental activities in proportion to the difficulty of the task at hand. However, it is still unclear whether this relationship between the pupil size and effort applies also to physical effort. In order to address this issue, we asked healthy volunteers to perform a power grip task, at varied intensity, while evaluating their effort both implicitly and explicitly, and while concurrently monitoring their pupil size. Each trial started with a contraction of imposed intensity, under the control of a continuous visual feedback. Upon completion of the contraction, participants had to choose whether to replicate, without feedback, the first contraction for a variable monetary reward, or whether to skip this step and go directly to the next trial. The rate of acceptance of effort replication and the amount of force exerted during the replication were used as implicit measures of the perception of the effort exerted during the first contraction. In addition, the participants were asked to rate on an analog scale, their explicit perception of the effort for each intensity condition. We found that pupil diameter increased during physical effort and that the magnitude of this response reflected not only the actual intensity of the contraction but also the subjects' perception of the effort. This finding indicates that the pupil size signals the level of effort invested in a task, irrespective of whether it is physical or mental. It also helps refining the potential brain circuits involved since the results of the current study imply a convergence of mental and physical effort information at some level along this pathway.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 162 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 21%
Student > Master 28 17%
Researcher 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 33 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 39 23%
Neuroscience 25 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 7%
Engineering 12 7%
Sports and Recreations 12 7%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 42 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,738,682
of 24,260,998 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#280
of 3,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,069
of 240,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#7
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,260,998 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,339 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.