↓ Skip to main content

Early life stress and macaque amygdala hypertrophy: preliminary evidence for a role for the serotonin transporter gene

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early life stress and macaque amygdala hypertrophy: preliminary evidence for a role for the serotonin transporter gene
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, October 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00342
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeremy D. Coplan, Hassan M. Fathy, Andrea P. Jackowski, Cheuk Y. Tang, Tarique D. Perera, Sanjay J. Mathew, Jose Martinez, Chadi G. Abdallah, Andrew J. Dwork, Gustavo Pantol, David Carpenter, Jack M. Gorman, Charles B. Nemeroff, Michael J. Owens, Arie Kaffman, Joan Kaufman

Abstract

Children exposed to early life stress (ELS) exhibit enlarged amygdala volume in comparison to controls. The primary goal of this study was to examine amygdala volumes in bonnet macaques subjected to maternal variable foraging demand (VFD) rearing, a well-established model of ELS. Preliminary analyses examined the interaction of ELS and the serotonin transporter gene on amygdala volume. Secondary analyses were conducted to examine the association between amygdala volume and other stress-related variables previously found to distinguish VFD and non-VFD reared animals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
United States 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 93 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 22%
Researcher 16 17%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 21 22%
Unknown 16 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 20%
Neuroscience 18 19%
Psychology 13 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 14%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 23 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2018.
All research outputs
#14,720,444
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#1,946
of 3,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,107
of 256,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#49
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.