You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Nocebo Effect in Randomized Clinical Trials of Antidepressants in Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, November 2014
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00375 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Johanna Carolina Rojas-Mirquez, Milton Jose Max Rodriguez-Zuñiga, Francisco Javier Bonilla-Escobar, Herney Andres Garcia-Perdomo, Mike Petkov, Lino Becerra, David Borsook, Clas Linnman |
Abstract |
To compare the incidence of adverse events between active and placebo arms of randomized clinical trials in depressive children and adolescents (C&A) with antidepressant treatments, in order to look for similarities in both groups that allow to establish a possible nocebo effect. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 27% |
Belgium | 1 | 9% |
Malaysia | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 100 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 21 | 20% |
Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
Other | 22 | 21% |
Unknown | 18 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 38% |
Psychology | 15 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 10% |
Unknown | 22 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,063,987
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#167
of 3,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,222
of 262,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#2
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.