↓ Skip to main content

A behavioral task for investigating action discovery, selection and switching: comparison between types of reinforcer

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A behavioral task for investigating action discovery, selection and switching: comparison between types of reinforcer
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, November 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00398
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon D. Fisher, Jason P. Gray, Melony J. Black, Jennifer R. Davies, Jeffery G. Bednark, Peter Redgrave, Elizabeth A. Franz, Wickliffe C. Abraham, John N. J. Reynolds

Abstract

Action discovery and selection are critical cognitive processes that are understudied at the cellular and systems neuroscience levels. Presented here is a new rodent joystick task suitable to test these processes due to the range of action possibilities that can be learnt while performing the task. Rats learned to manipulate a joystick while progressing through task milestones that required increasing degrees of movement accuracy. In a switching phase designed to measure action discovery, rats were repeatedly required to discover new target positions to meet changing task demands. Behavior was compared using both food and electrical brain stimulation reward (BSR) of the substantia nigra as reinforcement. Rats reinforced with food and those with BSR performed similarly overall, although BSR-treated rats exhibited greater vigor in responding. In the switching phase, rats learnt new actions to adapt to changing task demands, reflecting action discovery processes. Because subjects are required to learn different goal-directed actions, this task could be employed in further investigations of the cellular mechanisms of action discovery and selection. Additionally, this task could be used to assess the behavioral flexibility impairments seen in conditions such as Parkinson's disease and obsessive-compulsive disorder. The versatility of the task will enable cross-species investigations of these impairments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 3%
France 1 3%
Unknown 36 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 24%
Researcher 8 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 18%
Neuroscience 7 18%
Engineering 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 6 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2015.
All research outputs
#18,388,295
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#2,597
of 3,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,165
of 362,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#59
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.