You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lateralization of music processing with noises in the auditory cortex: an fNIRS study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00418 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hendrik Santosa, Melissa Jiyoun Hong, Keum-Shik Hong |
| Abstract |
The present study is to determine the effects of background noise on the hemispheric lateralization in music processing by exposing 14 subjects to four different auditory environments: music segments only, noise segments only, music + noise segments, and the entire music interfered by noise segments. The hemodynamic responses in both hemispheres caused by the perception of music in 10 different conditions were measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. As a feature to distinguish stimulus-evoked hemodynamics, the difference between the mean and the minimum value of the hemodynamic response for a given stimulus was used. The right-hemispheric lateralization in music processing was about 75% (instead of continuous music, only music segments were heard). If the stimuli were only noises, the lateralization was about 65%. But, if the music was mixed with noises, the right-hemispheric lateralization has increased. Particularly, if the noise was a little bit lower than the music (i.e., music level 10~15%, noise level 10%), the entire subjects showed the right-hemispheric lateralization: This is due to the subjects' effort to hear the music in the presence of noises. However, too much noise has reduced the subjects' discerning efforts. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 113 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 14% |
| Researcher | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 39 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 20 | 17% |
| Psychology | 16 | 14% |
| Engineering | 15 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 42 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2020.
All research outputs
#16,576,329
of 25,182,110 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#2,170
of 3,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,257
of 373,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#43
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,182,110 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.