↓ Skip to main content

Episodic memory and self-reference via semantic autobiographical memory: insights from an fMRI study in younger and older adults

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Episodic memory and self-reference via semantic autobiographical memory: insights from an fMRI study in younger and older adults
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00449
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandrine Kalenzaga, Marco Sperduti, Adèle Anssens, Penelope Martinelli, Anne-Dominique Devauchelle, Thierry Gallarda, Marion Delhommeau, Stéphanie Lion, Isabelle Amado, Marie-Odile Krebs, Catherine Oppenheim, Pascale Piolino

Abstract

Self-referential processing relies mainly on the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) and enhances memory encoding (i.e., Self-Reference Effect, SRE) as it improves the accuracy and richness of remembering in both young and older adults. However, studies on age-related changes in the neural correlates of the SRE on the subjective (i.e., autonoetic consciousness) and the objective (i.e., source memory) qualitative features of episodic memory are lacking. In the present fMRI study, we compared the effects of a self-related (semantic autobiographical memory task) and a non self-related (general semantic memory task) encoding condition on subsequent episodic memory retrieval. We investigated encoding-related activity during each condition in two groups of 19 younger and 16 older adults. Behaviorally, the SRE improved subjective memory performance in both groups but objective memory only in young adults. At the neural level, a direct comparison between self-related and non self-related conditions revealed that SRE mainly activated the cortical midline system, especially the MPFC, in both groups. Additionally, in older adults and regardless of the condition, greater activity was found in a fronto-parietal network. Overall, correlations were noted between source memory performance and activity in the MPFC (irrespective of age) and visual areas (mediated by age). Thus, the present findings expand evidence of the role of the MPFC in self-referential processing in the context of source memory benefit in both young and older adults using incidental encoding via semantic autobiographical memory. However, our finding suggests that its role is less effective in aging.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Unknown 123 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 23%
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 25 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 59 46%
Neuroscience 16 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 35 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2015.
All research outputs
#15,316,776
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#2,216
of 3,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,331
of 353,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#51
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.