↓ Skip to main content

Choking under pressure: the neuropsychological mechanisms of incentive-induced performance decrements

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
24 X users
video
3 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Choking under pressure: the neuropsychological mechanisms of incentive-induced performance decrements
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, February 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rongjun Yu

Abstract

In contrast to the assumption of efficiency wage models, which state that wage incentives should be positively correlated with productivity, high incentives may produce performance decrements in real life scenarios. Such a "choking under pressure" phenomenon exemplifies how psychological stress can profoundly shape human behavior, for good or for bad. Previous theories suggest that individual choking under pressure because that high pressure may distract individuals' attention away from the task (the distraction account), raise the attention paid to step-by-step skill processes (the explicit monitoring account), or elevate the arousal in general (the over-arousal account). Recent neuroimaging studies have shown that several brain regions implicated in motivation and top-down control of attention also play a key role in stress-induced choking, supporting for the over-arousal and distraction theories of choking. This review aims to identify psychological factors that determine choking and the neural underpinnings of these processes. Insights into how incentives influence performance may aid engineering training regimens and interventions that equip individuals to better handle high-stakes-induced psychological stress, and to thrive under stress.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 170 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 18%
Student > Master 29 16%
Student > Bachelor 26 15%
Researcher 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 34 19%
Unknown 33 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 68 39%
Sports and Recreations 14 8%
Neuroscience 12 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 42 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2023.
All research outputs
#653,507
of 24,943,708 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#110
of 3,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,962
of 368,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#8
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,943,708 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.