↓ Skip to main content

Male mice song syntax depends on social contexts and influences female preferences

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 3,485)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
53 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
18 X users
facebook
10 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
167 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Male mice song syntax depends on social contexts and influences female preferences
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, April 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00076
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan Chabout, Abhra Sarkar, David B. Dunson, Erich D. Jarvis

Abstract

In 2005, Holy and Guo advanced the idea that male mice produce ultrasonic vocalizations (USV) with some features similar to courtship songs of songbirds. Since then, studies showed that male mice emit USV songs in different contexts (sexual and other) and possess a multisyllabic repertoire. Debate still exists for and against plasticity in their vocalizations. But the use of a multisyllabic repertoire can increase potential flexibility and information, in how elements are organized and recombined, namely syntax. In many bird species, modulating song syntax has ethological relevance for sexual behavior and mate preferences. In this study we exposed adult male mice to different social contexts and developed a new approach of analyzing their USVs based on songbird syntax analysis. We found that male mice modify their syntax, including specific sequences, length of sequence, repertoire composition, and spectral features, according to stimulus and social context. Males emit longer and simpler syllables and sequences when singing to females, but more complex syllables and sequences in response to fresh female urine. Playback experiments show that the females prefer the complex songs over the simpler ones. We propose the complex songs are to lure females in, whereas the directed simpler sequences are used for direct courtship. These results suggest that although mice have a much more limited ability of song modification, they could still be used as animal models for understanding some vocal communication features that songbirds are used for.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Portugal 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Unknown 195 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 27%
Researcher 34 17%
Student > Master 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 4%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 32 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 33%
Neuroscience 55 27%
Psychology 15 7%
Engineering 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 38 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 483. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#55,925
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#16
of 3,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#525
of 279,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#1
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.