↓ Skip to main content

Differences in long-term memory stability and AmCREB level between forward and backward conditioned honeybees (Apis mellifera)

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differences in long-term memory stability and AmCREB level between forward and backward conditioned honeybees (Apis mellifera)
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, April 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00091
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johannes Felsenberg, Yan Dyck, Janina Feige, Jenny Ludwig, Jenny Aino Plath, Anja Froese, Melanie Karrenbrock, Anna Nölle, Karin Heufelder, Dorothea Eisenhardt

Abstract

In classical conditioning a predictive relationship between a neutral stimulus (conditioned stimulus; CS) and a meaningful stimulus (unconditioned stimulus; US) is learned when the CS precedes the US. In backward conditioning the sequence of the stimuli is reversed. In this situation animals might learn that the CS signals the end or the absence of the US. In honeybees 30 min and 24 h following backward conditioning a memory for the excitatory and inhibitory properties of the CS could be retrieved, but it remains unclear whether a late long-term memory is formed that can be retrieved 72 h following backward conditioning. Here we examine this question by studying late long-term memory formation in forward and backward conditioning of the proboscis extension response (PER). We report a difference in the stability of memory formed upon forward and backward conditioning with the same number of conditioning trials. We demonstrate a transcription-dependent memory 72 h after forward conditioning but do not observe a 72 h memory after backward conditioning. Moreover we find that protein degradation is differentially involved in memory formation following these two conditioning protocols. We report differences in the level of a transcription factor, the cAMP response element binding protein (CREB) known to induce transcription underlying long-term memory formation, following forward and backward conditioning. Our results suggest that these alterations in CREB levels might be regulated by the proteasome. We propose that the differences observed are due to the sequence of stimulus presentation between forward and backward conditioning and not to differences in the strength of the association of both stimuli.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 25%
Student > Master 3 15%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 15%
Neuroscience 3 15%
Computer Science 1 5%
Unknown 3 15%