You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cerebellar damage impairs the self-rating of regret feeling in a gambling task
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00113 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Silvia Clausi, Giorgio Coricelli, Iolanda Pisotta, Enea Francesco Pavone, Marco Lauriola, Marco Molinari, Maria Leggio |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 99 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 18% |
| Researcher | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 20% |
| Unknown | 21 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 24 | 24% |
| Neuroscience | 23 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 32 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2018.
All research outputs
#4,244,144
of 23,103,903 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#711
of 3,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,555
of 265,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#13
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,903 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.