↓ Skip to main content

A time estimation task as a possible measure of emotions: difference depending on the nature of the stimulus used

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A time estimation task as a possible measure of emotions: difference depending on the nature of the stimulus used
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, June 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00143
Pubmed ID
Authors

Auriane Gros, Maurice Giroud, Yannick Bejot, Olivier Rouaud, Sophie Guillemin, Corine Aboa Eboulé, Valeria Manera, Anaïs Daumas, Martine Lemesle Martin

Abstract

Time perception is fundamental for human experience. A topic which has attracted the attention of researchers for long time is how the stimulus sensory modality (e.g., images vs. sounds) affects time judgments. However, so far, no study has directly compared the effect of two sensory modalities using emotional stimuli on time judgments. In the present two studies, healthy participants were asked to estimate the duration of a pure sound preceded by the presentation of odors vs. emotional videos as priming stimuli (implicit emotion-eliciting task). During the task, skin conductance (SC) was measured as an index of arousal. Olfactory stimuli resulted in an increase in SC and in a constant time overestimation. Video stimuli resulted in an increase in SC (emotional arousal), which decreased linearly overtime. Critically, video stimuli resulted in an initial time underestimation, which shifted progressively towards a time overestimation. These results suggest that video stimuli recruited both arousal-related and attention-related mechanisms, and that the role played by these mechanisms changed overtime. These pilot studies highlight the importance of comparing the effect of different kinds on temporal estimation tasks, and suggests that odors are well suited to investigate arousal-related temporal distortions, while videos are ideal to investigate both arousal-related and attention-related mechanisms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Puerto Rico 1 2%
France 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 51 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 20%
Student > Master 10 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 15 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 21 39%
Neuroscience 7 13%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Linguistics 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 17 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2022.
All research outputs
#6,575,027
of 23,932,398 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#1,030
of 3,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,894
of 269,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#25
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,932,398 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.