↓ Skip to main content

Motor imagery reinforces brain compensation of reach-to-grasp movement after cervical spinal cord injury

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Motor imagery reinforces brain compensation of reach-to-grasp movement after cervical spinal cord injury
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, September 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00234
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sébastien Mateo, Franck Di Rienzo, Vance Bergeron, Aymeric Guillot, Christian Collet, Gilles Rode

Abstract

Individuals with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) that causes tetraplegia are challenged with dramatic sensorimotor deficits. However, certain rehabilitation techniques may significantly enhance their autonomy by restoring reach-to-grasp movements. Among others, evidence of motor imagery (MI) benefits for neurological rehabilitation of upper limb movements is growing. This literature review addresses MI effectiveness during reach-to-grasp rehabilitation after tetraplegia. Among articles from MEDLINE published between 1966 and 2015, we selected ten studies including 34 participants with C4 to C7 tetraplegia and 22 healthy controls published during the last 15 years. We found that MI of possible non-paralyzed movements improved reach-to-grasp performance by: (i) increasing both tenodesis grasp capabilities and muscle strength; (ii) decreasing movement time (MT), and trajectory variability; and (iii) reducing the abnormally increased brain activity. MI can also strengthen motor commands by potentiating recruitment and synchronization of motoneurons, which leads to improved recovery. These improvements reflect brain adaptations induced by MI. Furthermore, MI can be used to control brain-computer interfaces (BCI) that successfully restore grasp capabilities. These results highlight the growing interest for MI and its potential to recover functional grasping in individuals with tetraplegia, and motivate the need for further studies to substantiate it.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 121 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 20%
Student > Master 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Researcher 13 10%
Professor 6 5%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 23 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 13%
Neuroscience 14 11%
Engineering 13 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Psychology 11 9%
Other 28 22%
Unknown 32 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2015.
All research outputs
#18,425,370
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#2,602
of 3,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,910
of 267,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#79
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.