You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Incidental rewarding cues influence economic decisions in people with obesity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00278 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jakob Simmank, Carsten Murawski, Stefan Bode, Annette Horstmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 23% |
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 22% |
| Unknown | 19 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 27 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 20% |
| Unknown | 27 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2015.
All research outputs
#15,528,733
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#1,670
of 3,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,563
of 293,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#35
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.