↓ Skip to main content

Twelve-Day Reinforcement-Based Memory Retention in African Cichlids (Labidochromis caeruleus)

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Twelve-Day Reinforcement-Based Memory Retention in African Cichlids (Labidochromis caeruleus)
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, August 2016
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00157
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erica Ingraham, Nicole D. Anderson, Peter L. Hurd, Trevor J. Hamilton

Abstract

The formation of long-term memories for food sources is essential for the survival of most animals. Long-term memory formation in mammalian species has been demonstrated through a variety of conditioning tasks, however, the nature of long-term memory in fish is less known. In the current study, we explored whether African cichlids (Labidochromis caeruleus) could form memories for food-reinforced stimuli that last for 12 days. During the training sessions, fish were reinforced for approaching an upward drifting line grating. After a rest period of 12 days, fish demonstrated a significant preference for the upward drifting grating. To determine whether this preference could also be reversed, fish were then reinforced for approaching a downward drifting line grating after a 20-day rest period. When tested 12 days later, there were no significant differences in preference for either stimulus; however, following a second training period for the downward stimulus, there was a significant preference for the downward drifting grating. This suggests that cichlids are able to form reversible discrimination-based memories for food-reinforced stimuli that remain consolidated for at least 12 days.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 25%
Student > Master 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Professor 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 19%
Neuroscience 3 19%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2020.
All research outputs
#5,541,528
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#831
of 3,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,322
of 342,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#7
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.