↓ Skip to main content

Cardiac Signals Are Independently Associated with Temporal Discounting and Time Perception

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cardiac Signals Are Independently Associated with Temporal Discounting and Time Perception
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bowen J. Fung, Damien L. Crone, Stefan Bode, Carsten Murawski

Abstract

Cardiac signals reflect the function of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and have previously been associated with a range of self-regulatory behaviors such as emotion regulation and memory recall. It is unknown whether cardiac signals may also be associated with self-regulation in the temporal domain, in particular impulsivity. We assessed both decision impulsivity (temporal discounting, TD) and time perception impulsivity (duration reproduction, DR) in 120 participants while they underwent electrocardiography in order to test whether cardiac signals were related to these two aspects of impulsivity. We found that over the entire period of task performance, individuals with higher heart rates had a tendency toward lower discount rates, supporting previous research that has associated sympathetic responses with decreased impulsivity. We also found that low-frequency components of heart rate variability (HRV) were associated with a less accurate perception of time, suggesting that time perception may be modulated by ANS function. Overall, these findings constitute preliminary evidence that autonomic function plays an important role in both decision impulsivity and time perception.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 30%
Student > Master 9 12%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 18 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 33 45%
Neuroscience 9 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Engineering 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 21 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2017.
All research outputs
#6,259,354
of 24,820,264 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#921
of 3,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,221
of 429,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#18
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,820,264 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.