↓ Skip to main content

Risk Assessment of Neonatal Exposure to Low Frequency Noise Based on Balance in Mice

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk Assessment of Neonatal Exposure to Low Frequency Noise Based on Balance in Mice
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, February 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00030
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nobutaka Ohgami, Reina Oshino, Hiromasa Ninomiya, Xiang Li, Masashi Kato, Ichiro Yajima, Masashi Kato

Abstract

General electric devices and ventilation systems are known to generate low frequency noise (LFN) with frequencies of <100 Hz. Previous studies showed that exposure to LFN caused impairments of balance in humans and mice during adulthood. On the other hand, a previous study showed that noise levels in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) were greater than those in general home or office environments. Therefore, it is possible that neonates have a potential risk to be exposed to LFN in the NICU. However, the risk of neonatal exposure to LFN remains unclear in humans and mice. In this study, male ICR mice were exposed to LFN at 100 Hz for 4 weeks after birth and then subjected to rotarod and beam crossing tests in order to assess LFN-mediated risk of imbalance during the neonatal period. Exposure to LFN at 70 dB, but not exposure to LFN up to 60 dB, during the neonatal period significantly decreased performance scores for rotarod and beam crossing tests compared to the scores of the control group. The number of calbindin-positive hair cells in the saccule and utricle was decreased in mice exposed to LFN at 70 dB for 4 weeks in the neonatal phase. Cessation of exposure for 10 weeks did not result in recovery of the decreased performance in rotarod and beam crossing tests. Thus, our results suggest that 70 dB is a possible threshold for exposure to LFN for 4 weeks during the neonatal period causing unrecoverable imbalance in mice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 5 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Master 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 7 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 4 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 11 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2017.
All research outputs
#14,331,382
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#1,902
of 3,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,429
of 311,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#42
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.