↓ Skip to main content

Inversion Reveals Perceptual Asymmetries in the Configural Processing of Human Body

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inversion Reveals Perceptual Asymmetries in the Configural Processing of Human Body
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, July 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00126
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniele Marzoli, Chiara Lucafò, Caterina Padulo, Giulia Prete, Laura Giacinto, Luca Tommasi

Abstract

Ambiguous human bodies performing unimanual/unipedal actions are perceived more frequently as right-handed/footed rather than left-handed/footed, which suggests a perceptual and attentional bias toward the right side of others' body. A bias toward the right arm of human bodies could be adaptive in social life, most social interactions occurring with right-handed individuals, and the implicit knowledge that the dominant hand of humans is usually placed on their right side might also be included in body configural information. Given that inversion disrupts configural processing for human bodies, we investigated whether inversion reduces the bias toward the right side of human bodies. Consistent with our hypothesis, when presented with ambiguous stimuli depicting humans performing lateralized actions or movements, participants perceived a greater proportion of right-handed figures when the stimuli were shown upright than when the stimuli were shown inverted. The present findings seem to confirm our hypothesis that body configural information may include some form of knowledge about the probable handedness of other individuals, although alternative accounts involving the role of experience cannot be ruled out.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 5 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 29%
Neuroscience 3 21%
Computer Science 1 7%
Unknown 6 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2017.
All research outputs
#17,899,796
of 22,981,247 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#2,428
of 3,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,838
of 313,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#52
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,981,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.