↓ Skip to main content

Prenatal Temperature Shocks Reduce Cooperation: Evidence from Public Goods Games in Uganda

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prenatal Temperature Shocks Reduce Cooperation: Evidence from Public Goods Games in Uganda
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, December 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00249
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Duchoslav

Abstract

Climate change has not only led to a sustained rise in mean global temperature over the past decades, but also increased the frequency of extreme weather events. This paper explores the effect of temperature shocks in utero on later-life taste for cooperation. Using historical climate data combined with data on child and adult behavior in public goods games, I show that abnormally high ambient temperatures during gestation are associated with decreased individual contributions to the public good in a statistically and economically significant way. A 1 standard deviation rise in mean ambient temperature during gestation is associated with a 10% point decrease in children's cooperation rate in a dichotomous public goods game, and the reduced taste for cooperation lasts into adulthood.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 13 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Other 10 23%
Unknown 20 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2018.
All research outputs
#15,486,175
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#2,240
of 3,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,279
of 440,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#45
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.