You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neurobiological Aspects of Face Recognition: The Role of Oxytocin
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00195 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Olga L. Lopatina, Yulia K. Komleva, Yana V. Gorina, Haruhiro Higashida, Alla B. Salmina |
| Abstract |
Face recognition is an important index in the formation of social cognition and neurodevelopment in humans. Changes in face perception and memory are connected with altered sociability, which is a symptom of numerous brain conditions including autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Various brain regions and neuropeptides are implicated in face processing. The neuropeptide oxytocin (OT) plays an important role in various social behaviors, including face and emotion recognition. Nasal OT administration is a promising new therapy that can address social cognition deficits in individuals with ASD. New instrumental neurotechnologies enable the assessment of brain region activation during specific social tasks and therapies, and can characterize the involvement of genes and peptides in impaired neurodevelopment. The present review sought to discuss some of the mechanisms of the face distinguishing process, the ability of OT to modulate social cognition, as well as new perspectives and technologies for research and rehabilitation of face recognition. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 26% |
| Burkina Faso | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Portugal | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 89% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 185 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 15% |
| Researcher | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 63 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 47 | 25% |
| Neuroscience | 21 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 11% |
| Unknown | 75 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 108. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2023.
All research outputs
#394,329
of 25,632,496 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#66
of 3,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,327
of 344,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#3
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,632,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,483 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.