You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Making “Good” Choices: Social Isolation in Mice Exacerbates the Effects of Chronic Stress on Decision Making
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnbeh.2020.00081 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arish Mudra Rakshasa, Michelle T. Tong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 20% |
| Mexico | 1 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 26 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 16 | 20% |
| Psychology | 8 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
| Decision Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 30 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2023.
All research outputs
#5,237,235
of 25,468,708 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#831
of 3,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,052
of 428,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#12
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,468,708 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.