You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficacy evaluation of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating glioma from metastatic tumor of the brain and exploration of its association with patients’ neurological function
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.957795 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhuo Shi, Jiuming Jiang, Lizhi Xie, Xinming Zhao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2022.
All research outputs
#15,712,362
of 23,347,114 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#2,279
of 3,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,106
of 435,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#71
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,347,114 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.