↓ Skip to main content

Bayesian Exploration for Intelligent Identification of Textures

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurorobotics, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 1,049)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
16 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
294 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
300 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bayesian Exploration for Intelligent Identification of Textures
Published in
Frontiers in Neurorobotics, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnbot.2012.00004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeremy A. Fishel, Gerald E. Loeb

Abstract

In order to endow robots with human-like abilities to characterize and identify objects, they must be provided with tactile sensors and intelligent algorithms to select, control, and interpret data from useful exploratory movements. Humans make informed decisions on the sequence of exploratory movements that would yield the most information for the task, depending on what the object may be and prior knowledge of what to expect from possible exploratory movements. This study is focused on texture discrimination, a subset of a much larger group of exploratory movements and percepts that humans use to discriminate, characterize, and identify objects. Using a testbed equipped with a biologically inspired tactile sensor (the BioTac), we produced sliding movements similar to those that humans make when exploring textures. Measurement of tactile vibrations and reaction forces when exploring textures were used to extract measures of textural properties inspired from psychophysical literature (traction, roughness, and fineness). Different combinations of normal force and velocity were identified to be useful for each of these three properties. A total of 117 textures were explored with these three movements to create a database of prior experience to use for identifying these same textures in future encounters. When exploring a texture, the discrimination algorithm adaptively selects the optimal movement to make and property to measure based on previous experience to differentiate the texture from a set of plausible candidates, a process we call Bayesian exploration. Performance of 99.6% in correctly discriminating pairs of similar textures was found to exceed human capabilities. Absolute classification from the entire set of 117 textures generally required a small number of well-chosen exploratory movements (median = 5) and yielded a 95.4% success rate. The method of Bayesian exploration developed and tested in this paper may generalize well to other cognitive problems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
France 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 279 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 85 28%
Researcher 50 17%
Student > Master 49 16%
Student > Bachelor 18 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 42 14%
Unknown 41 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 147 49%
Computer Science 50 17%
Neuroscience 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Materials Science 7 2%
Other 29 10%
Unknown 51 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2022.
All research outputs
#864,203
of 25,601,426 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurorobotics
#12
of 1,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,845
of 251,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurorobotics
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,601,426 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,049 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them